Internal Revenue Service

Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201442046
Release Date: 10/17/2014
Index Number: 2036.00-00, 2038.00-00,
2501.00-00, 2601.00-00

Re:
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
ID No.
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:04
PLR-151442-13
Date:
June 18, 2014
LEGEND
Grantor =
Company =
State =
Child 1 =
Child 2 =
Child 3 =
Child 4 =
Year 1 =
Attorney 1 =
Date 1 =
Children’s Trust =
Date 2 =
Year 2 =
Accountant =
Year 3 =
Financial Planner =
Attorney 2 =
Court =
Date 3 =
Date 4 =
Year 4 =
Statute 1 =
Statute 2 =
Citation 1 =

Dear :
This letter responds to your submission dated December 20, 2013, and subsequent correspondence regarding the effect of a state court reformation of a trust for federal gift and estate tax purposes.

FACTS

The facts submitted and representations made are as follows:

Grantor is a businessman and a co-owner of Company in State. Grantor is married and has four adult children, Child 1, Child 2, Child 3, and Child 4 (collectively, Children). In Year 1, Grantor and his wife met with Attorney 1 to discuss short- and ong-term estate planning, including the use of grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs). Attorney 1 was retained to prepare estate planning documents, including powers of attorney, medical powers, and living wills. Further discussions ensued about creating two GRATs, one for a four-year term (GRAT 1) and another for a fifteen-year term (GRAT 2). In contemporaneous correspondence, Attorney 1 informed Grantor that a GRAT “may be an effective means for you to retain all or most of the income from a igh-yielding and rapidly appreciating property . . . to transfer that property to a child or other person with minimal gift tax cost while saving estate taxes.” Grantor agreed to the lan and on Date 1, Grantor established GRAT 1 and GRAT 2. On the same date, Grantor made gifts of Company stock to GRAT 1 and GRAT 2.

Pursuant to the terms of GRAT 1, Grantor was to retain the right to receive an annuity for four years, after which the remaining trust assets, if any, would pass to the Children’s Trust, a trust for the benefit of Grantor’s Children. The terms of GRAT 2 are similar to GRAT 1, but with a fifteen-year term. The remainder beneficiary of GRAT 2 is also Children’s Trust.

Children’s Trust, dated Date 2, was drafted as a revocable trust, permitting Grantor to revoke the trust at any time, as well as amend or modify the Children’s Trust t any time. The terms of Children’s Trust provide that with respect to any assets received by the trustee, such assets shall be set apart in a separate and equal share, or “Sub Trust” (Separate Trust), for each of Grantor’s Children. If any child is not then living, such child’s share is to be held in further trust for such child’s own children, or if none, to be paid equally among the then-surviving children of Grantor, or if none, equally among all of Grantor’s grandchildren. During the term of each Separate Trust,the trustee is directed to distribute “so much of the income and so much of the principal as they may deem appropriate and advisable in their sole and absolute discretion for the health, welfare, education, and support” of the child who is the beneficiary of such Separate Trust. Any income not expended in any year is to be added to principal. andatory distributions of principal are to be made to each beneficiary at ages 28, 31, and 34. If a child dies prior to the termination of his or her Separate Trust, that child’s share is to be held in trust for his or her own children, or if none, distributed to specified relatives pursuant to the provisions in Children’s Trust. The initial trustee of Children’s Trust is Grantor. By its terms, Children’s Trust conforms consistently to the erms of a revocable instrument (e.g., creating powers under § 2036 or 2038).

In Year 2, Accountant was retained by Grantor to prepare the Form 709 (United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return) reporting the Date 1 transfers to GRAT 1 and GRAT 2. After reviewing the trust documents, Accountant contacted Grantor to express concerns about the language in the Children’s Trust. Specifically, Accountant noted, and was alarmed by the fact, that the language making Children’s Trust revocable by Grantor appeared to defeat Grantor’s intent in creating GRAT 1 and GRAT 2 by causing the remainder interests in the GRATs to be included in the estate of Grantor for federal estate tax purposes and causing any distributions from Children’s Trust to Grantor’s children to be taxable gifts for federal gift tax purposes. Accountant contacted Attorney 1 to express his concerns, but Attorney 1 insisted that his drafting of Children’s Trust was proper and noted that Accountant, not being an attorney, did not understand the State law governing the trust. Accountant memorialized his conversation with Attorney 1 in a contemporaneous file memorandum and prepared Grantor’s gift tax return for Year 1 showing completed gifts to GRAT 1 and GRAT 2.

Several years later in Year 3, Company retained Financial Planner to work with Company shareholders on financial and estate planning issues. Financial Planner reviewed Grantor’s estate planning documents and also concluded that the Children’s Trust contained incorrect provisions. Financial Planner retained Attorney 2 to review Children’s Trust who confirmed that for Grantor’s transfers to GRAT 1 and GRAT 2 to be complete as intended, Grantor should not have the power to revoke the Children’s Trust. Financial Planner informed Grantor that Children’s Trust was flawed. Grantor contacted Attorney 1, who continued to maintain that the drafting of Children’s Trust was proper and that the transfers to the GRATs were, in fact, ompleted gifts and out of Grantor’s estate.

Grantor subsequently retained Attorney 2 to reform Children’s Trust under State law. On Date 3, a petition was filed in State Court requesting reformation of Children’s Trust to correct mistakes under scrivener’s error. State Court approved the petition on Date 4, providing an Order that the correction of these scrivener’s errors made by the reformation are to be effective ab initio, as if they were included in the original Children’s Trust as executed on Date 2. Specifically, Article FOURTEENTH is restated as follows:

FOURTEENTH: This Trust and any trusts created hereunder shall be irrevocable and not subject to modification by the Grantor. The Grantor intends any transfers the Trustees hereunder to be completed transfers for federal gift and estate tax purposes. The Grantor intends to retain no power or interest,direct or indirect, that will cause inclusion in the Grantor’s federal gross estate of any property transferred to the Trustees hereunder under any provision of the Internal Revenue Code, including but not limited to §§ 2036, 2037 and 2038.Every provision of this Trust shall be construed to effectuate the intentions set forth in this Article and any provision of this Trust that is inconsistent with any of these intentions shall be void.

The Order of the Court is conditioned upon the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service (Service) of a private letter ruling stating that the Service will respect the Court’s retroactive reformation of the Children’s Trust for federal estate and gift tax purposes. Such ruling must be received within 9 months of Date 4 or the Court’s order will become void.

It is represented that Grantor intended to make completed gifts of Company stock when transferred to GRAT 1 and GRAT 2 on Date 1. Grantor did not intend to retain any powers over the Children’s Trust that would cause the gifts on Date 1 to be incomplete or that would cause the assets of Children’s Trust to be included in his estate (unless he did not survive the GRAT term). Attorney 1 attests in a sworn affidavit that “due to a scrivener’s error,” the Children’s Trust was drafted as a revocable trust which would only be appropriate to include the assets in the Grantor’s gross estate for federal tax purposes. Further, Attorney 1 avers that “[t]hese provisions were contrary to [Grantor’s] intent.”

You request the following rulings:

1. As a result of the reformation of Children’s Trust to correct scrivener’s errors, the Grantor’s transfers of the remainder interests in GRAT 1 and GRAT 2 will be completed gifts, and upon the completion of the respective GRAT terms, the distribution f the remainder interests to the Children’s Trust will not cause the Grantor to make an additional gift.
2. As a result of the reformation of Children’s Trust to correct scrivener’s errors, the assets of the Children’s Trust will not be included in the gross estate of Grantor when he dies.
3. The reformation of Children’s Trust to correct scrivener’s errors will not cause any current or future beneficiary of the Trust to make a gift to any other current or future beneficiary of the Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2033 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that the value of the gross estate includes the value of all property to the extent of a decedent’s interest in the property at the time of his death.

Section 2036(a) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of all property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer (except in case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, under which he has retained for his life or for any period not ascertainable without reference to his death orfor any period which does not in fact end before his death – – (1) the possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income from, the property, or (2) the right, either alone or in conjunction with any person, to designate the persons who shall possess or enjoy the property or the income therefrom.

Section 2038(a)(1) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of all property, to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer (except in case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, where the enjoyment thereof was subject at the date of his death to any change through the exercise of a power (in whatever capacity exercisable) by the decedent alone or by the decedent inconjunction with any other person (without regard to when or from what source the decedent acquired such power), to alter, amend, revoke, or terminate, or where any such power is relinquished during the 3-year period ending on the date of theecedent’s death.

Section 2501 imposes a tax on the transfer of property by gift by an individual.

Section 2511 provides that the gift tax applies whether the transfer is in trust or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property is real or personal, tangible or intangible.

Section 2512(a) provides that if a gift is made in property, the value of the property at the date of the gift is considered the amount of the gift. Where property is transferred for less than an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth, the gift is the amount by which the value of the property transferred exceeded the valueof the consideration.

It is well settled under State law that the mistake of a scrivener in preparing a deed or other writing may be established by parol evidence, and the instrument reformed accordingly. Citation 1. However, the evidence required to reform a written instrument must be clear, precise, convincing, and of the most satisfactory character.Citation 2.

In Year 4, State adopted Uniform Trust Code 415, which allows the reformation of the terms of a trust to correct mistakes. The statute provides:

The court may reform a trust instrument, even if unambiguous, to conform to the settlor’s probable intention if it is proved by clear and convincing evidence that the settlor’s intent as expressed in the trust instrument was affected by a mistake of fact or law, whether in expression or inducement.he court may provide that the modification have retroactive effect.

Statute 1. State also enacted Statute 2 which provides:

The court may modify a trust instrument in a manner that is not contrary to the settlor’s probable intention in order to achieve the settlor’s tax objectives. The court may provide that the modification have retroactive effect.

In Commissioner v. Estate of Bosch, 387 U.S. 456 (1967), the Court considered whether a state trial court’s characterization of property rights conclusively binds a federal court or agency in a federal estate tax controversy. The Court concluded that the decision of a state trial court as to an underlying issue of state law should not be controlling when applied to a federal statute. Rather, the highest court of the state is thebest authority on the underlying substantive rule of state law to be applied in the federal matter. If there is no decision by that court, then the federal authority must apply what it finds to be state law after giving “proper regard” to the state trial court’s determinationand to relevant rulings of other courts of the state. In this respect, the federal agency may be said, in effect, to be sitting as a state court.

In this case, affidavits made by the Grantor, Attorney 1, Accountant, Financial Planner, and Attorney 2, together with contemporaneous correspondence, memoranda, and emails provide clear and convincing evidence that the provision in Children’s Trust of Grantor’s power to revoke Children’s Trust does not conform to the Grantor’s intention. The correspondence from Attorney 1 indicates that the transfers to GRAT 1 and GRAT 2 were intended to be completed gifts. In reforming Children’s Trust,State Court found that there was clear and convincing evidence of scrivener’s errors, the reformation of Children’s Trust was necessary and appropriate to achieve Grantor’stax objectives, and the reformation was not contrary to Grantor’s intentions.

Therefore, we conclude that State Court’s Order on Date 4, reforming Children’s Trust based on scrivener’s errors is consistent with applicable State law, as applied by the highest court of State. Accordingly, we conclude that as a result of the reformation of Children’s Trust to correct scrivener’s errors: (1) the transfers of the remainder interests in GRAT 1 and GRAT 2 are completed gifts, and upon the completion of the respective GRAT terms, the distribution of the remainder interests to Children’s Trust will not cause the Grantor to make an additional gift; (2) the assets of Children’s Trust will not be included in the gross estate of Grantor when he dies(provided Grantor survives the annuity period of the respective GRATs); and (3) the Court’s reformation of Children’s Trust will not cause any current or future beneficiary of the trust to make a gift to any other current or future beneficiary of the trust.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,
Leslie H. Finlow
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Internal Revenue Service

Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201722007
Release Date: 6/2/2017
Index Number: 1001.00-00, 1015.00-00,
2036.00-00, 2037.00-00,
2038.00-00, 2501.00-00,
61.00-00, 643.00-00, 661.00-
00, 662.00-00

Person To Contact:
ID No.
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04 – PLR-125870-16
PLR-125871-16
Date: February 16, 2017
Legend
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
Date 3 =
Grantor =
Trustee =
Trustee =
GRAT =

Trust 1 =
Trust 2 =
State =
Co-Trustees =
Son 1 =
Son 2 =
Corporation =
State Statute 1 =
State Statute 2 =

Court =
Dear :

This letter responds to correspondence, dated August 17, 2016 requesting
rulings regarding the income, gift, and estate tax consequences of a proposed
modification of two trusts.

The facts submitted and the representations made are as follows. Grantor is a
resident of State. Grantor has two sons, Son 1 and Son 2. Both sons are under the age of 35. Grantor has no other children, deceased children, grandchildren, or more remote descendants. No additional children are expected to be born to Grantor.

On Date 1, Grantor created a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (“GRAT”). The retained term expired on Date 2 at which time the remaining assets in GRAT became subject to a continuing trust, Trust 1, for Grantor’s two sons.

On Date 2, GRAT owned shares in Corporation, an S corporation. In order to
allow continued qualification as an S corporation shareholder, the Co-Trustees, pursuant to paragraph 5.16 of GRAT, divided the shares in Corporation into a separate trust, Trust 2, and made an electing small business trust (“ESBT”) election consistent with § 1361(e). Spouse and Corporate Trustee are Co-Trustees of Trust 1 and Trust 2 (collectively “Trusts”).

Pursuant to Article Second, paragraph 2.1(a), until the earlier of (a) the death of the last living child of Grantor, or (ii) the date upon which the youngest living child of Grantor attains the age of 35 (the “Original Division Date”), the Co-Trustees of Trust 1 are to pay to or apply for the benefit of Son 1 and Son 2 so much of the income or principal as may be necessary for their health, education, maintenance, and support.

Paragraph 2.1(b) provides that upon the Original Division Date, the Co-Trustees of Trust 1 are directed to distribute principal of the trust to Grantor’s lineal descendants, subject to the equalization provision in paragraph 2.1(b(1) (the “Equalization Distribution”). The Equalization Distribution requires the Co-Trustees of Trust 1 to first distribute to Son 1 cash, securities, and/or other property to take into account the value of certain gifts made to Son 2 prior to GRAT’s creation. After the Equalization Distribution to Son 1, the balance of Trust 1 is divided equally between Son 1 and Son 2, if both sons are living on the Original Division Date.

Paragraph 2.1(b) also provides that if either son predeceases the Original Division Date, his descendants, if any, will take in per stirpes shares the property that such deceased son would have received if he was then living. If a son predeceases the Original Division Date without any surviving descendants, the other son (or his descedants, if any) will take the property of the deceased son. If both sons predecease age 35 without surviving descendants, upon the death of the last son to die, the remaining trust property passes to the descendants of Grantor’s siblings. These beneficiaries are referred to as “contingent beneficiaries.”

Trust 2 provides nearly identical terms to those in Trust 1, including an equalizing distribution.

State Statute 1 provides that a noncharitable irrevocable trust may be modified on consent of the trustee and all beneficiaries if the court concludes that modification is not inconsistent with a material purpose of the trust.

State Statute 2 provides, in relevant part, that a trust may be divided into two or more separate trusts on petition by a trustee or beneficiary if the court is satisfied that such division will not defeat or materially impair the accomplishment of trust purposes or interests of the beneficiaries.

The Co-Trustees of Trust 1 and the Trust 2 propose to modify Trusts to vest an
independent trustee with discretion to divide Trusts’ assets into two separate trusts (“Successor Trusts”), where each Successor Trust will benefit one of Grantor’s sons, and the descendants of such son if he dies before attaining the age of 35. Provided a son survives to age 35, only that son would be eligible for distributions from his Successor Trust. If a son dies prior to age 35, his descendants, if any, would be eligible to receive the remainder of that son’s Successor Trust, or if such son has no descendant then living, the remainder interest would pass to his brother, or the brother’s descendants, if any. If both sons predecease the age of 35 years without leaving any surviving descendants, the same contingent beneficiaries receive the remainder of their Successor Trusts.

Successor Trusts provide for a Final Distribution Date which is defined as the earlier of (a) the death of the last living child of Grantor, or (ii) the date upon which the youngest living child of Grantor attains the age of 35. The modifications and any future divisions of the Trusts are pursuant to authority granted under State Statutes 1 and 2 and only after approval by a court of competent jurisdiction in State.

Pursuant to the modifications of Trusts, the Co-Trustees will have the authority to establish and fund Successor Trusts prior to the Original Division Date in part or in whole at any time the Co-Trustees deem appropriate. When funding Successor Trusts, the Co-Trustees shall first satisfy the Equalization Distribution owed to the Successor Trust for Son 1’s benefit.

The provisions of each Successor Trust will continue to be governed by the
terms of Trusts, except that as long as there are any living descendants of Son 1 or Son 2, distributions of income and principal will be limited to the son and descendants of that particular son’s family line. Pursuant to Successor Trusts, Son 1 may become the sole trustee of his trust and Son 2 may become the sole trustee of his trust. In all other respects, the terms of Successor Trusts will be identical to Trusts.

After satisfying the Equalization Distribution, if and when the Co-Trustees decide to distribute any remaining assets in funding the Successor Trusts, the Co-Trustees of the Trusts will fund the Successor Trusts by allocating a pro-rata portion of each and every asset of the post-equalization property between the Successor Trusts.

The Co-Trustees filed petitions for the modifications of Trusts with Court, to which all beneficiaries consented. On Date 3, Court issued orders (Orders) approving the modifications of Trusts effective upon the receipt of a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service.

Co-Trustees petitioned to modify Trusts for the following reasons: (i) The
modifications will provide for the Grantor’s sons in a manner that equalizes Son 1 for certain gifts made to Son 2 prior to GRAT’s creation on Date 1; (ii) The formula is complicated and will become progressively more complicated with the passage of time.(iii) The modifications will allow each son to participate in the management of his own trust, as trustee, enhancing each son’s financial acumen and experience; and (iv) The Equalization Distribution will trigger income taxes and the modifications will avoid waiting longer to fund the Equalization Distribution which would further exacerbate the potential income tax liability.

You have requested the following rulings:

1. The modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into SuccessorTrusts will not create or result in a transfer of property subject to federal gift tax under § 2501 of the Internal Revenue Code.

2. The modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts will not cause any portion of the assets of Trusts or Successor Trusts to be includible in the gross estate of any beneficiary under § 2035, 2036, 2037, or 2038.

3. The Successor Trusts will be treated as separate trusts for federal income tax purposes pursuant to § 643(f).

4. The modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts will not result in treating any property as paid, credited, or distributed for 5 purposes of § 661 or § 1.661(a)-2(f) of the Income Tax Regulations, and so will not result in realization of any income, gain, or loss under § 661 or § 662 by Trusts,Successor Trusts, or a beneficiary of the trusts. In addition, the modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts will not result in the realization of any income, gain or loss to Trusts, Successor Trusts, or a beneficiary of those trusts under § 61 or § 1001, except to the extent the Equalization Distribution is funded in kind with appreciated property.

5. The modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts will result in each Successor Trust holding its share of the respective Trust’s property with the same basis as it had when owned by such Trust at the time of division into a Successor Trust under § 1015, except to the extent the Equalization Distribution is funded in kind with appreciated property.

RULING 1

Section 2501 imposes a tax for each calendar year on the transfer of property by gift during such calendar year by any individual.

Section 2511(a) provides that the gift tax applies whether the transfer is in trust or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property transferred is real or personal, tangible or intangible.

Section 25.2511-1(a) of the Gift Tax regulations provides that the gift tax applies to a transfer by way of gift whether the transfer is in trust or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property is real or personal, tangible or intangible.

Section 25.2511-1(c)(1) provides that the gift tax also applies to gifts indirectly
made. Any transaction in which an interest in property is gratuitously passed or conferred upon another, regardless of the means or device employed, constitutes a gift subject to tax.

Section 25.2511-1(c)(2) provides, in relevant part, except in the case of a qualified disclaimer, any disposition by a beneficiary, heir or next-of-kin whereby ownership is transferred gratuitously to another constitutes the making of a gift by the beneficiary, heir or next-of-kin.

Section 25.2511-1(g)(1) provides that donative intent on the part of the transferor is not an essential element in the application of the gift tax to the transfer. The application of the tax is based on the objective facts of the transfer and the circumstances under which it is made, rather than on the subjective motives of the donor. However, there are certain types of transfers to which the tax is not applicable.It is applicable only to a transfer of a beneficial interest in property. It is not applicable to a transfer of bare legal title to a trustee. A transfer by a trustee of trust property in which he has no beneficial interest does not constitute a gift by the trustee.

In this case, the modifications of Trusts and any future division of Trust 1 and
Trust 2 into Successor Trusts pursuant to Court Orders do not increase, decrease, or otherwise change any beneficiary’s beneficial interest in Trusts. Accordingly, based upon the facts submitted and the representations made, the modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trust 1 and Trust 2 into Successor Trusts will not create or result in a transfer of property subject to federal gift tax under § 2501.

RULING 2

Section 2033 provides that the value of the gross estate includes the value of all property to the extent of the interest therein of the decedent at the time of his death.

Section 2035(a) provides that if (1) the decedent made a transfer (by trust or
otherwise) of an interest in property, or relinquished a power with respect to any property, during the three-year period ending on the date of the decedent’s death, and (2) the value of such property (or an interest therein) would have been included in the decedent’s gross estate under § 2036, 2037, 2038, or 2042 if such ransferred interest or relinguished power had been retained by the decedent on the date of his death, the value of the gross estate shall include the value of any property (or interest therein) that would have been so included. Under § 2035(b), the amount of the gross estate shall be increased by the amount of any gift tax paid by the decedent or his estate on any gift made by the decedent or his spouse during the 3-year period ending on the date of the decedent’s death.

Section 2036(a) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of all property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer (except in the case of a bona fide sale for an adequate consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, under which the decedent has retained for his life or for any period not ascertainable without reference to the decedent’s death or for any period which does not in fact end before the decedent’s death (1) the possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income from, the property, or (2) the right, either alone or in conjunction with any person, to designate the persons who shall possess or enjoy the property or the income therefrom.

Section 2037(a) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of all property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer (except in the case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, if (1) the possession or enjoyment of the property can, through ownership of such interest, be obtained only by surviving the decedent, and (2) the decedent has retained a reversionary interest in the property and the value of the reversionary interest immediately before the death of the decedent exceeds 5-percent of the value of the property.

Section 2038(a)(1) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the
value of all property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer (except in case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, where the enjoyment thereof was subject at the date of the decedent’s death to any change through the exercise of a power (in whatever capacity exercisable) by the decedent alone or by the decedent in conjunction with any other person (without regard to when or from what source the decedent acquired such power), to alter, amend, revoke, or terminate, or where any such power is relinquished during the 3-year period ending on the date of the decedent’s death.

In order for §§ 2035 through 2038 to apply, a decedent must have made a transfer of property or any interest therein (except in the case of a bona fide sale for an adequate consideration in money or money’s worth) under which the decedent retained an interest in, or power over, the income or corpus of the transferred property. The beneficiaries of Trusts and Successor Trusts will have the same interests after the modification of Trusts and any future division of Trusts into Successor Trusts as they have prior to the modifications and divisions. Therefore, nothing will be transferred by them by reason of the modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts. Accordingly, based upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trust 1 and Trust 2 into Successor Trusts will not cause any portion of the assets of Trust 1 or Trust 2 or Successor Trusts to be ncludible in the gross estate of any beneficiary under § 2035, 2036, 2037 or 2038 in the event that either Son 1 or Son 2 (or any other beneficiary) dies before the Final Division Date.

RULING 3

Section 643(f) provides that, for purposes of subchapter J of chapter 1 of subtitle A, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, two or more trusts shall be treated as one trust if (1) such trusts have substantially the same grantor or grantors and substantially the same primary beneficiary or beneficiaries, and (2) a principal purpose of such trusts is the avoidance of the tax imposed by chapter 1.

Section 1806(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 provides that § 643(f) shall apply to taxable years beginning after March 1, 1984; except that, in the case of a trust that was irrevocable on March 1, 1984, it shall apply only to that portion of the trust that is attributable to contributions of corpus after March 1, 1984.

Taxpayer represents that each Successor Trust will have different beneficiaries.Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that as long as the Successor Trusts are separately managed and administered, they will be treated as separate trusts for federal income tax purposes.

RULING 4 (Part 1)

Section 61(a)(3) and (15) provides that gross income includes gains derived from dealings in property and income from an interest in an estate or trust.

Section 1001(a) provides that the gain from the sale or other disposition of
property is the excess of the amount realized over the adjusted basis provided in § 1011 for determining gain, and the loss is the excess of the adjusted basis provided in § 1011 for determining loss over the amount realized.

Section 1001(b) provides that the amount realized from the sale or other disposition of property shall be the sum of any money received plus the fair market value of any property (other than money) received. Under § 1001(c) the entire amount of gain or loss on the sale or exchange of property shall be recognized, except as otherwise provided.

Section 1.1001-1(a) provides that, except as provided in subtitle A, the gain or
loss realized from the exchange of property for other property differing materially either in kind or in extent is treated as income of loss sustained.

An exchange of property results in the realization of gain under § 1001 if the
properties exchanged are materially different. Cottage Savings Association v.
Commissioner, 499 U.S. 554 (1991). A material difference when the exchanged
properties embody legal entitlement different in kind or extent, or if they confer different rights and powers. Id. at 565.

Section 1.1001-1(h) provides that the pro-rata division or severance of any trust pursuant to authority in an applicable state statute or pursuant to the governing instrument is not an exchange of property differing materially either in kind or extent

If the Trusts are divided into Successor Trusts, the Co-Trustees of Trusts will allocate assets of Trusts to the Successor Trusts on a pro-rata basis after satisfying the Equalization Distribution with respect to Son 1’s Successor Trust. The division of Trusts into the Successor Trusts serves primarily to effect the terms of GRAT and does not change the interests of the beneficiaries.

Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts pursuant to the modified terms of Trusts will not result in the realization of any income, gain, or loss to Trusts, Successor Trusts, or a beneficiary of any of those trusts under § 61 or § 1001 as a result of the division, except to the extent the Equalization Distribution is funded in kind with appreciated property.

RULING 4 (Part 2)

Section 661(a) provides that in any taxable year a deduction is allowed in computing the taxable income of a trust (other than a trust to which subpart B applies),for the sum of (1) the amount of income for such taxable year required to be distributed currently; and (2) any other amounts properly paid or credited or required to be distributed for such taxable year. However, such deduction shall not exceed the distributable net income (DNI) of the estate or trust.

Section 1.661(a)-2(f) provides that gain or loss is realized by the trust or estate (or the other beneficiaries) by reason of a distribution of property in kind if the distribution is in satisfaction of a right to receive a distribution of a specific dollar amount, of specific property other than that distributed, or of income as defined under § 643(b) and the applicable regulations, if income is required to be distributed currently.

Section 662(a) provides that there shall be included in the gross income of a beneficiary to whom an amount specified in § 661(a) is paid, credited, or required to be distributed (by an estate or trust described in § 661), the sum of the following amounts:(1) the amount of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently to such beneficiary, whether distributed or not; and (2) all other amounts properly paid, credited,or required to be distributed to such beneficiary for the taxable year.

Rev. Rul. 82-4, 1982-1 C.B. 99, addresses the income tax results of the distribution of an estate residue between two children, when one of two children is to be first equalized for the value of a lifetime transfer to the other child. The ruling holds that such equalizing distribution is a distribution in satisfaction of a right to receive a specific dollar amount, and the estate may realize gain on distribution of appreciated property in kind in satisfaction of that amount.

In accordance with the conclusion that the post-equalization property divisions of Trust 1 and Trust 2 will not result in gain or loss under § 61 or § 1001, we also conclude that, based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, the proposed divisions of the post-equalization property will not result in income, gain or loss to the trusts under § 661, § 662, or § 1.661(a)-2(f). Consistent with Rev. Rul. 82-4, gain will be recognized on funding of Successor Trusts to the extent appreciated assets are used to satisfy the Equalization Distribution in kind.

RULING 5

Section 1015(a) provides that if the property was acquired by gift, the basis shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the donor or the last preceding owner by whom it was not acquired by gift, except that if the basis (adjusted for the period before the date of the gift as provided in § 1016) is greater than the fair market value of the property at the time of the gift then for the purpose of determining loss the basis shall be the fair market value.

Section 1.1015-2(a)(1) provides that in the case of property acquired after December 31, 1920, by transfer in trust (other than by a transfer in trust by gift, bequest,or devise) the basis of property so acquired is the same as it would be in the hands of the grantor increased in the amount of gain or decreased in the amount of loss recognized to the grantor on the transfer under the law applicable to the year in which the transfer was made. If the taxpayer acquired the property by a transfer in trust, the basis applies whether the property be in the hands of the trustee, or the beneficiary, and whether acquired prior to the termination of the trust and distribution of the property, or thereafter.

Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude the modifications of Trusts and any future divisions of Trusts into Successor Trusts will result in each Successor Trust holding its share of the respective Trust’s property with the same basis as it had when owned by such Trust at the time of division into a Successor Trust under § 1015, except to the extent the Equalization Distribution is funded with appreciated property in kind.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion on the federal tax
consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
Lorraine E. Gardner
Lorraine E. Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)